|
When panel shapes become
complex, the analyze theory based on the beam model is not precise enough
to handle problems. Using Finite Element Analyse in every complex panel
to get stress details was a dream to many lifting engineers in the past
few years. Now TiltMAX makes the dream come true.
Let's
try an example. The picture below illustrates the panel's shape, dimension
and also proposed insert locations.
Using
Beam Model:
You can obtain the result
of vertical direction easily, but it is very hard to get any information
in horizontal direction, even do not consider interactive between horizontal
and vertical. There is no obvious zero shear line between the bottom line
and the first row insert.
Using Finite Element Analyze (2D) Model:
You can have panel results in all directions -- vertical bendingmoment
at bottom (MYBOT) ; vertical bendingmoment at top (MYTOP) ; horizontal
bendingmoment at bottom (MXBOT) ; horizontal bendingmoment at top (MXTOP)
.
(Click on the small pictures or text in blue to view higher
resolution imges.)
Some observations
from the above results:
- In the first row
insert level, the vertical bendingmoment at bottom in the middle leg
is three times higher than the other two legs. Between the first row
insert and the second row insert level, the vertical bending moment
at bottom of three legs are roughly the same.
- In the first row
insert level, the vertical bendingmoment at top in the middle leg is
close to zero, in the side legs are higher up to 3.4 klb*ft/ft. Temporary
wind load introduces a vertical bendingmoment at top at bracing point.
- The horizontal
bendingmoment at bottom in the lower lintel is 7.64klb*ft/ft, this indicates
the interactive between the lower lintel and the middle leg.
- The horizontal
bendingmoment at top in the middle of top lintel is 1.2 klb*ft/ft, shows
that the middle leg has a relative bigger stiffness than the top lintel.
Contact
Element:
Using contact element
can avoid ground providing hold down force to the bottom edge of a panel
and also exactly model the relationship between ground and the bottom
edge of the panel. The following is an example showing the difference
of using contact element and without contact element.

The picture above
illustrates the panel's shape, dimension and proposed insert locations.
| |
MYBOT
|
MYTOP
|
MXBOT
|
|
Without Contact Element at Bottom
|
 |
 |
 |
|
With Contact Element at Bottom
|
 |
 |
 |
(Click on the small pictures to view higher resolution
imges.)
| |
MXTOP
|
UZ
|
|
Without Contact Element at Bottom
|
 |
 |
|
With Contact Element at Bottom
|
 |
 |
Notice the significant
difference of the vertical bendingmoment at bottom (MYBOT) of the legs.
|